An Ontological Analysis of Corporate Income: The Diversity of Markets and the Power of Collective Declaration
Corporate profit, or net income on corporate financial statements, has tremendous influences on individual and organizational behaviours. It determines not only corporate performance and its fate in the market, but also sometimes economy as a whole. This study is a unique attempt to analyze corporate profit/income from an ontological standpoint. Obviously, they are just numbers do not exist physically, but, as mentioned, quite powerful as a set of numbers.
Then, it is interesting that, in addition to net income (or what is called the bottom line) on the income statement, accounting scholars and professionals have come up with a new concept of comprehensive income, and the international accounting standards board is currently considering improving the format of the income statement (how to calculate various incomes on corporate income statements). These cases tell us that the income is not a static but dynamic concept. Then, what does the income reflect? Do the changes of the way corporate income is calculated reflect changes of the way we see market or market itself? This study grapples with these questions by relying on philosophical and sociological analysis of institutions.
Particularly, after discussing the dynamics of the concept of corporate income, this study firstly introduces the perspective of performativity. By considering various studies on the concept of performativity (e.g., Brisset (2019) and Okamoto (2020)), this study argues that collective corporate profit performs collective attitudes in the markets. Next, applying recent Jackson (2019)’s perspective as well as Dodd (2014)’s one, the diversity of markets and the relativity of how we perceive markets are highlighted. Finally, it insists that the standard setters’ political activity, or standard setting, is significant in institutional building, and by relying on Searle (2009) and Tuomela (2002), this study puts forth a perspective of collective declarations based on the Tuomela’s viewpoint of operative members. In sum, this study can be an additional contribution to the underresearched concept of Searlean ‘declaration’.
Only ISOS members (with valid fee) can access to the discussion section. Visit ISOS website to subscribe.